While driving under the influence is a misdemeanor offense, the consequences may be more serious than a felony. This is because a conviction has additional penalties not seen for other crimes.

A conviction for DUI results in a revoked driver’s license. And a revoked license can, hypothetically, last forever.

The offense of DUI is codified in the Illinois Vehicle Code at 625 ILCS 5/11-501. The statute provides that an individual can be guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol in Illinois in two ways:

First, a person is guilty if the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath is 0.08 or higher. See 11-501(a)(1). This section is known as DUI per se in the respect that regardless of whether the driver is impaired, if his BAC is 0.08, he is guilty. Section (a)(1) enforces the legal limit.

The State’s Attorney will use the results of a breathalyzer test or blood test to prove the defendant’s guilt in these cases. The Illinois State Police have a practice of certifying breathalyzer machines for accuracy. Nonetheless, the practice is prone to error. The defendant can question the accuracy and reliability of the testing methods.

Second, a motorist is guilty of the offense of DUI if he is ‘under the influence of alcohol.’ See 11-501(a)(2). Under Section (a)(2), the accused is guilty if he is impaired.

The Illinois Supreme Court has defined ‘under the influence’ in its pattern jury instructions.

23.29 Definition Of Under The Influence Of Alcohol

A person is under the influence of alcohol when, as a result of drinking any amount of alcohol, his mental or physical faculties are so impaired as to reduce his ability to think and act with ordinary care.

And so, the issue is whether the prosecution can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was so impaired that he couldn’t exercise ordinary care.

To prove its case, the prosecution will have the arresting officer testify that the defendant failed standardized field sobriety tests. These tests were developed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). While the tests are standardized, they are not always administered properly. If the police officer fails to follow protocol, the accuracy of the tests are compromised.

In all prosecutions, the defendant can contest whether the police had probable cause to make the arrest. If there is a finding of no probable cause, the case will be dismissed.

For example, the arresting officer must have reasonable suspicion that the defendant violated the law, or was about the violate the law, before making a traffic stop. If the officer cannot articulate a basis for stop, the court will quash the arrest.

Each case should be reviewed carefully for probable cause and evidentiary issues.

One thing I am fond of saying is, ‘It’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove.’ When people come to my office after getting arrested for DUI, I remind them, ‘I don’t care whether you’re guilty. The question is whether the prosecution can prove it.’

If there is any cause for optimism after getting arrested for DUI, it’s the fact that the prosecution has to prove it. The accused, on the other hand, doesn’t have to prove anything. The accused is presumed innocent.

The rules favor the defendant.

Illinois domestic battery prosecutions: reviewing the law and penalties

March 13, 2013
Thumbnail image for Illinois domestic battery prosecutions: reviewing the law and penalties

Domestic battery is one of the most common criminal charges prosecuted in Illinois courts. The number of arrests is so large that most courthouses have a courtroom that is dedicated to hearing these cases only. All courthouses in Cook County have one or more courtrooms dedicated to hearing these cases. For examples, all Chicago arrests […]

Read the full article →

Investigative alerts allow Chicago police to make false arrests without warrants or probable cause

March 6, 2013
Thumbnail image for Investigative alerts allow Chicago police to make false arrests without warrants or probable cause

With the help of local media, the public is learning more about a dubious practice by the Chicago Police Department of making warrantless arrests based on questionable information. The Tribune reported the story of Frank Craig, an Army veteran who sued the City of Chicago for his arrest in 2006. Police officers arrested him inside […]

Read the full article →

Cook County jail overcrowding: inmate population almost at maximum capacity

March 3, 2013
Thumbnail image for Cook County jail overcrowding: inmate population almost at maximum capacity

10,136. That’s the maximum number of inmates the Cook County jail can hold. And according to Sheriff Tom Dart, the jail has almost reached that limit. Jail administrators are concerned because the while the jail is not yet at capacity right now, the population swells during the summer months when more offenders are arrested. The […]

Read the full article →

Illinois juvenile law: commission says raise age at which youth are prosecuted as adults

February 28, 2013
Thumbnail image for Illinois juvenile law: commission says raise age at which youth are prosecuted as adults

An Illinois advocacy group is urging lawmakers in Springfield to change the age at which youth offenders can be charged as adults. Prior to 2010, anyone arrested and charged with a crime who was 17 years old was prosecuted as an adult. In 2010, the law changed. Under the current law, offenders who are 17 […]

Read the full article →

Summary of aggravated identity theft under federal law

December 8, 2011
Thumbnail image for Summary of aggravated identity theft under federal law

Federal law has two statutes that address the crime of identity theft. The first is 18 USC 1028. Congress passed this statute as part of the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrent Act in 1998. This was the first federal statute concerning the crime of identity theft, which is a modern offense. The offense of identity […]

Read the full article →

Overview of tax evasion and its elements

September 29, 2011
Thumbnail image for Overview of tax evasion and its elements

In order to get a conviction on tax evasion, the United States Attorney must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements of tax evasion. The crime of tax evasion is found at Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201. The statute provides the elements of tax evasion are the following: A tax deficiency. […]

Read the full article →

A summary of federal firearm laws

September 26, 2011
Thumbnail image for A summary of federal firearm laws

A person who possesses a gun can be charged with a crime if he is disqualified from legally possessing the weapon. The charge can be based on state law where the gun is possessed within the boundaries of a state. Or the charge can be based on federal law whenever the gun travels interstate. Federal […]

Read the full article →

Brief comparison of false statement and false claims statutes

April 6, 2011
Thumbnail image for Brief comparison of false statement and false claims statutes

A prosecution for making a false statement to the federal government is usually based on Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. This is the false statement statute that makes it a crime to knowingly make a false statement to the United States government or an employee thereof. 18 USC 1001 is used to prosecute […]

Read the full article →
Thumbnail image for A summary of federal wire fraud

A summary of federal wire fraud

February 9, 2011

The federal statute on wire fraud is Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. Congress passed the wire fraud statute in 1952 as part of the Communications Act Amendment. The law against mail fraud was already on the books at that point, but Congress wanted to extend the mail fraud provisions to cover new technology. […]

Read the full article →