The United States Constitution requires that in all criminal cases, the prosecution must disclose to the defendant all evidence that proves guilt, as well as all evidence that proves innocence. Evidence falls into two general categories, inculpatory and exculpatory.
Inculpatory evidence is generally any evidence that proves the defendant is guilty of the offense charged or deserving of punishment.
Exculpatory evidence is anything that proves the defendant is innocent, or at least suggests that the prosecution is unable to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Exculpatory evidence is called Brady material, for the case Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, in which the Supreme Court held that due process mandates the disclosure of exculpatory evidence.
The fact that a witness testifying against the defendant previously made a statement that is inconsistent with his trial testimony may not prove innocence, but it does weaken the government’s case against the defendant. A statement that is inconsistent with trial testimony against the defendant is called impeachment evidence. Due process requires the disclosure of impeachment evidence as well.
Federal courts have held that the law requires the disclosure of all exculpatory evidence regardless of whether the defendant requests it. See Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 432-33 (1995).
The US Attorney will disclose exculpatory evidence almost immediately during the discovery process.
However, federal law mandates that impeachment evidence such as a prior inconsistent statement does not have to be tendered until the trial. See 18 USC 3500 (the Jencks Act).
The general rule is that the prosecution must disclose exculpatory and impeachment evidence within a reasonable time to allow the defendant to use it in trial. See Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545, 559 (1997).
There are instances where federal prosecutors will delay disclosing exculpatory evidence because of national security concerns, such as where the information is classified. In these cases, the government may be concerned about the practice of gray mail, where a defendant threatens to disseminate classified information during trial. If the government wants to restrict access to this evidence, strict procedures must be followed pursuant to the Classified Information Procedures Act, which is found at 18 USC App III.
Impeachment evidence may be delayed because of decisions by the prosecution on which witnesses will testify against the defendant. A defendant is entitled to impeachment evidence (eg, statements that are inconsistent with trial testimony) for the witnesses that are expected to testify against the defendant at trial. For those witnesses who will not testify, the defendant may not be entitled to impeaching statements.